Categories
Current Events Erika Ink Slingers NFP and contraceptives Respect Life

BabyCenter advocates for abortifacients?

 

Many Catholic Sistas contributors participated on another site called BabyCenter when we were pregnant. We were looking for information as well as support from women like ourselves. Our strong Catholic convictions soon resulted in groupings of like-minded individuals. This culminated in a lively BabyCenter message board for Catholics. Although we didn’t exclude anyone, we asked that members be courteous and use Church documentation in answering “tough” questions concerning birth control, abortions, gay marriage, etc.  The resulting  L-O-N-G ‘discussions’ sometimes found ladies who refused to comply with this request. We also were ‘trolled’ with frightening regularity. Occasionally we would have issues with what BabyCenter itself was advising women. But that never dampened our enthusiasm for educating others — if anything it fed us and kept us thinking outside the box.

Many of us have now all but abandoned BabyCenter with the advent of our CS blog as well as the upsurge of Groups on Facebook. However, none of us have lost our love of the Church and Her teachings. We scour the blogosphere for information that we can use for educational purposes. This lead to the discovery of an article entitled, BabyCenter.com Promotes Early Drug-induced Abortions on LifeSiteNews.com.  The author of this article was surprised that BabyCenter advises pregnant mothers in their 27th week to start thinking about tubal ligation and other ‘family planning’ methods. One of the suggested means of ‘family planning’ is the so-called Plan-B. Here is an excerpt from their article on this means of birth control:

“If your regular contraceptive method fails you or you forget to use it or use it incorrectly, using emergency contraception can significantly reduce your chances of getting pregnant. Emergency contraceptive pills — sold under the brand name Plan B — are the most commonly used method. (Alternatively, you may have a copper IUD inserted to prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex.)”

As a Catholic, I am utterly dismayed, but not surprised that a secular site like BabyCenter would push Plan-B. As a responsible person, I am affronted by the lack of concern women (and people in general) show about something as important as married intimacy.  After all, the leading reason for abortions (and birth control in general) is some form of convenience — cannot afford a baby, not enough time for pregnancy or a baby, job or school takes too much time, etc. No one looks to the root cause of pregnancy – sex, and moderating that behavior. No, that would trample on their right to consequence-free promiscuity. They would have to be abstinent or monogamous for that to work. That would mean they couldn’t have ‘fun’!

Most women who are on birth control or use Plan-B have no idea that there are consequences to these drugs. Oh, sure some women acknowledge that they have weight gain or some other minor side-effects from the hormonal forms of birth control. What they do not consider are the hidden aspects of their birth control: increased risks of certain cancers, increased risks for cardiovascular events like strokes, environmental concerns after excretion. If you’re going to be hard-nosed about it, these convenience medications are actually quite deadly not only for the woman ingesting them, or her unborn child, but also for the environment and everyone living in it. <—- That would be you and me!

Don’t believe me? First, let’s address the informational packets included with birth control (including Plan-B) that most people discard immediately. On these inserts, the FDA has required drug companies to include the mechanism of action and negative side effects. However, they don’t require this information to be written in large print, discussed by your doctor, or written in layman’s terms. The following information comes from the Plan-B package insert.

Plan B One-Step is believed to act as an emergency contraceptive principally by preventing ovulation or fertilization (by altering tubal transport of sperm and/or ova).

Next, it talks about preventing fertilization. Sounds pretty simple, if the egg and sperm don’t meet, then no problem, no baby. However, let’s look a little closer at how that happens. Altering this mucus can result by preventing fertilization, but it can also hinder the progress of the newly formed baby if fertilization has already occurred. This can result in ectopic pregnancy. Ectopic pregnancies account for approximately 2% of all reported pregnancies. Up to 10% of pregnancies reported in clinical studies of routine use of progestin- only contraceptives are ectopic. Let me repeat that. Up to 10% of pregnancies reported in clinical studies of routine use of progestin-only contraceptives are ectopic. In other words, your risk of ectopic pregnancy is significantly increased if you use a progestin-only contraceptive. That doesn’t sound like something you’d want to increase your risk of does it?

In addition, it may inhibit implantation (by altering the endometrium). It is not effective once the process of implantation has begun.

The secondary action listed is inhibiting implantation by thinning of the endometrium. What does that mean you ask? Well, the endometrium is responsible for forming the placenta. Why does that matter? It is this that feeds the newly conceived baby. Wait a minute… This is emergency contraception, meaning avoiding conception. If a baby has been conceived, then this isn’t avoiding conception at all is it? If conception has occurred, doesn’t that mean pregnancy has begun? Hmmmm — that doesn’t sound right, now does it?

So if you’re still thinking Plan-B sounds ok, let’s evaluate the safety testing done on it (and other hormonal birth control methods). First, let’s make an important note: Plan-B is available without a doctor’s prescription. That basically means that it is an over-the-counter drug like Tylenol. Theoretically, it is supposed to be kept behind the pharmacy counter, but in reality, who knows how good stores are about this regulation. So if your doctor doesn’t know you’re taking this and you don’t read the product insert, how are you going to know whether you should actually be taking this medication? You won’t. Heck, even doctors aren’t 100% certain because in numerous places in the insert there are two concerning phrases…

…pharmacokinetic data are not available for this population
and
No formal studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of…

 So now, let’s circle back to the original article reference. As a scientific issue, this type of “contraceptive” is actually an abortifacient. I’ve proven that using the package insert  and science (not emotion or religion). From a moral standpoint, all life is sacred — especially to Catholics. However, many people (Catholics included) either ignore or are ignorant of the link between life beginning at fertilization and the use of birth control.

“A life is a life, no matter how small.” Even Horton from, Horton Hears a Who, knew and addressed that issue. Young and old alike, applaud Horton’s protection and tolerance of the unseen lives on his flower. But where is the encouragement to protect the unseen lives in the womb? As their tag line suggests, BabyCenter should be about ‘pregnancy, baby, toddlers, and kids‘. When I joined BabyCenter, I envisioned support for my growing family, not advice on how to minimize my family’s size. Yet BabyCenter is taking the ‘family’ out of ‘family planning’.  Isn’t that counter to their stated purpose? What a travesty!

 

 

 

 

 

.

By Erika

Erika V. is a thirty-something mother of two (with four saints in heaven). With a degree in molecular biology, she works for her state’s police crime lab; although her dream is to stay home with her children and homeschool them. Her newly converted husband is a sometime auto mechanic and primarily a stay-at-home dad. Passionate about pro-life issues and science, she is a survivor of breast cancer while pregnant. At 20 weeks pregnant with her daughter (pregnancy number six), she was diagnosed with BRCA1 stage II breast cancer. When local doctors we stumped with the diagnosis, she traveled to MDAnderson where chemotherapy on pregnant women has been done for over twenty years. After delivering her baby girl and undergoing more chemotherapy, Erika has had a whirlwind of surgeries to combat the cancer as well as the complications of cancer treatments. Three years and eight surgeries later, she continues to be passionate about pro-life endeavors, even winning the local Right to Life group’s Life Award and serving on their working board of directors. She authors two blogs, one a mommy blog Biology Brain-Simon Says and one a breast cancer while pregnant blog Erika’s Miracle Journey. Blog posts are often filled with pro-life references, including medical journal articles supporting the pro-life position. While there isn’t often time, she also enjoys horses, reading, gardening, and KY bourbon.

3 replies on “BabyCenter advocates for abortifacients?”

Thank you Erika for sharing this…I had no idea! Though I signed up for Facebook when I was pregnant with my now 5 year old I never read beyond the age appropriate newsletter they sent out and soon even stopped reading that. I agree with your pronouncement wholeheartedly a ‘travesty’ indeed!

Thank you for confirming something I have always believed…that nothing I put into my body to regulate or prevent that which is natural could possibly be good.

Indeed a travesty! The worst part is that this information is what most women today EXPECT to find in a pregnancy/baby related website these days – they are looking for and wanting to find information on family AVOIDANCE, not family planning.
I can easily understand that there are so many innocently ignorant Catholics out there – let alone non-Catholics. I can only hope that your posts reaches as many hearts as possible.
Thanks for bringing up this important topic.

Comments are closed.