Quantcast

God Gave Us Dominion: Want to Save Animals? Save Humans First!

A staunchly pro-life Christian friend recently posted a photo on Facebook of a sad-faced animal in danger of being euthanized. I love this woman for her Christian witness, but I can’t help but feel that for every post about animal welfare, there’s at least one unpublished one about human welfare. Ignored in many of the pro-animal sentiments is the fact that there is a huge difference between animals and people! For one, I don’t expect my children or relatives to live outside all year, but I do expect my animals to do so. I also don’t expect my children or relatives to eat off the ground or drink out of puddles, but my animals do so willingly — sometimes bypassing fresh clean water for mud-puddle water. Animals and humans are vastly different and our respect needs to be different as well.

And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth. Genesis 1:26*

We need to teach our children that there’s a fundamental difference between animals and people. Humans were given a soul by God–when He breathed into Adam’s clay-body–whereas animals were created for humans’ use. Scripturally  God gave us dominion over the animals from the very beginning, but never mentioned creating animals in His Holy image. Our children know that while we care for our animal friends, we really love and respect our fellow humans. Children need to learn to be good stewards of the earth and all within it, but humans–not animals–are created in the image and likeness of God. As we learn in Genesis, animals were created for human companionship and use: our God-given dominion. The two were created for different reasons and have different dignities as creatures.

And the Lord God formed man of the slime of the earth: and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul. Genesis 2:6*

Part and parcel to our God-given dominion over animals is not only proper care of animals but also proper use of animals: for food, companionship, and other products. I “love” my animals, but I realize they are animals, not humans. I would die for my children, family, and friends, but not for my animals. I also sometimes think the “rescue” organizations that keep animals alive indefinitely, despite their medical condition(s) or lack of a consistent caregiver, are actually less humane than organizations that accept these realities and put the old or infirm animals to sleep. Whilst I think it is misguided and wrong to euthanize animals based only on their size or breed (as in the large dog laws and Pit-bull laws in place across the world), euthanizing animals who will never regain their health when they are unwanted by their owners seems logical. Suffering animals have no souls to be concerned about like aged or infirm humans. Animal suffering is not redemptive for them or for anyone else as human suffering can be.

The real problem, however, isn’t that society insists animals be treated humanely, but that so many people now have elevated them to the status of people, or in some cases, even above people. No, animals shouldn’t be abused. But there’s something wrong when animal rescue organizations pull at our hearts and demand more of our time, talent, and treasure than ones that care for people. Also, the amount of money spent yearly simply on our pets far exceeds the average yearly cost of one child. During the Christmas season, I was inundated by ads for animal rescues using religious music (the use of Silent Night really offended me) to pluck at viewer’s hearts. Instead of supporting disadvantaged humans directly with their resources, many people today are more willing to donate money to animal causes, while expecting others (usually the government) to support their fellow man. Our responsibility is to take care of the least of our people then care for those we have under our dominion: animals.

People were outraged when President Obama got a purebred dog for his daughters instead of rescuing an animal from a shelter. Yet many of those same people had no problem with Obama voting against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act that prevents doctors from killing ‘accidentally’ delivered living babies during an abortion procedure. According to God’s laws, which of these instances is immoral? Many people would be outraged if Obama was to ban abortion, but if he were to ban puppy mills people would hail him a hero.

If men quarrel, and one strike a woman with child, and she miscarry indeed, but live herself: he shall be answerable for so much damage as the woman’s husband shall require, and as arbiters shall award. Exodus 21:22*

The real irony is that if society would recognize and uphold the dignity of all human life and understand that it takes precedence over animal life, we’d have a more humane society, which would translate into a safer society for animals, too. Defending the rights of animals won’t teach society to better defend the rights of people, which is what many animal rights advocates believe. Instead, recognizing that every human being–regardless of stage, age, size, or ability–has an inherent dignity and God-given right to life will engender respect that will trickle down to better treatment of all of God’s creations–including animals.

*Scripture references are from Douay-Rheims Bible Translation

Did you enjoy this article? Sign up now!

About Erika

Erika V. is a thirty-something mother of two (with four saints in heaven). With a degree in molecular biology, she works for her state’s police crime lab; although her dream is to stay home with her children and homeschool them. Her newly converted husband is a sometime auto mechanic and primarily a stay-at-home dad. Passionate about pro-life issues and science, she is a survivor of breast cancer while pregnant. At 20 weeks pregnant with her daughter (pregnancy number six), she was diagnosed with BRCA1 stage II breast cancer. When local doctors we stumped with the diagnosis, she traveled to MDAnderson where chemotherapy on pregnant women has been done for over twenty years. After delivering her baby girl and undergoing more chemotherapy, Erika has had a whirlwind of surgeries to combat the cancer as well as the complications of cancer treatments. Three years and eight surgeries later, she continues to be passionate about pro-life endeavors, even winning the local Right to Life group’s Life Award and serving on their working board of directors. She authors two blogs, one a mommy blog Biology Brain-Simon Says and one a breast cancer while pregnant blog Erika’s Miracle Journey. Blog posts are often filled with pro-life references, including medical journal articles supporting the pro-life position. While there isn’t often time, she also enjoys horses, reading, gardening, and KY bourbon.

January 25, 2013 - 5:38 am

Cindy ~ The Veil of Chastity - Amen, amen, amen! Thank you, Erika.
Cindy ~ The Veil of Chastity recently posted..7 Myths Singles Must Resist: Myth #3My Profile

January 25, 2013 - 9:49 am

» 7 Quick Takes Friday, Vol. 2 AnnMarie Creedon - […] many animal rights groups are supportive of abortion.  To me, this is a paradox.  The Catholic Sistas blog has an excellent perspective on this topic.   They are also covering March for Life.  To […]

January 25, 2013 - 8:07 pm

Kerri - Excellent! Those commercials designed to pull at heart strings really bother me too.
Kerri recently posted..7 Quick Takes Friday, no. 51My Profile

January 26, 2013 - 7:51 am

Terri LaHugh - Excellent Erica!!! This has always bothered me, my Dtr used to get so heartbroken when she saw the sad, heart wrenching ads! I stressed the difference often of dogs and Babies!!! Thanks so much for such a well written and important issue!! Many blessings to you and your family!!
Ps, so happy you got to go to March for Life!!!

April 17, 2014 - 6:42 pm

Cindy - Excellent article! It has always bothered me how so many are against animal cruelty yet pro-abortion! It makes no sense.

May 3, 2014 - 12:32 pm

ada - (forgive my English, I’m not a native speaker) From my discussions with friends who are pro-abortion, it seems that their willingness to accept death of babies comes from a dislike of selves as humans – while animals project a sort of innocence which cannot be lost or destroyed, as opposed to the innocence of people. They long for trust and acceptance but feel that they’ve lost the ability to let their guard down with other people. They hurt deeply.

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

CommentLuv badge

H o b n o b
F r i e n d s